August 9, 2017 § Leave a comment
Sometimes the most fascinating things become the centre of public shitstorms. For example, recently, a British conservative got all worked up into a later over a BBC cartoon for kids that appears to show a Roman family as African, as in black. Chances are, this character was based on Quintus Lollius Urbicus, the Roman Berber governor of the province of Britain from 139-42. He was from what is now Algeria. Mary Beard, Professor of Ancient Literature at Cambridge University and author of the Times Literary Supplement’s column/blog A Don’s Life, got involved on the discussion on Twitter and noted the ethnic diversity of the Roman Empire in general, which is kind of obvious, given the geographic spread of said Empire.
And then, things got insane, as they do on Twitter. Beard was attacked in the typical misogynist tones of social media. And then, NYU Professor of Risk Management, Nassim Nicholas Taleb, got involved and mocked Beard on Twitter. Now Taleb is usually somewhat of a buffoon on Twitter, he seems to have fun with the platform. And there is nothing wrong with this. But, he acted like a prat.
Still waiting to find out what you know of Roman Britain. Nothing so far as I know in you pop risk books. Haven't read other.
— mary beard (@wmarybeard) August 2, 2017
Ha! Trying to decredentialize me w/"pop risk" nonsense will backfire: I get more academic citations per year than you got all your life!
— NassimNicholasTaleb (@nntaleb) August 2, 2017
Then British journalist Nick Cohen got involved:
Because Mr Cohen, you're an imbecile. She went SOLELY after my credentials, I put mine in perspective to hers.
— NassimNicholasTaleb (@nntaleb) August 3, 2017
Ah, the fragility of the male ego. But, here’s the thing, Beard did not go after his credentials. She went after his knowledge-base and area of expertise. Beard, of course, knows a thing or two about a thing or two about Rome. Taleb, on the other hand, is a professor of risk management. Apples and oranges. But, male privilege means that one does not need to defer to greater expertise on the part of a female colleague. This reminds me of the time that my wife, who was then writing a dissertation on Northern Ireland, was told by a male colleague that The Troubles were ended because of the Cranberries’ song, “Zombies,” as if the people of Northern Ireland, Catholic and Protestant, suddenly realized that they were the zombies!
But Taleb was just a bore. He became the cover Twitter misogynists used to attack Beard, not for her ideas or commentary. No. They commented on her body, her age, and so on. And they denigrated her academic qualifications. Commentators continually referred to Prof. or Dr. Taleb and to Ms. Beard.
This, I hate to say, is par for the course in academia and the wider world. I cannot count the number of times I have seen or heard this in action, where my female colleagues are disrespected in this manner. One reported that her course evaluations talked more about her body than her teaching efficacy. Another reported that her looks seemed more important to her students than her knowledge. The now largely disused site RateMyProf initially only allowed hot tamales to indicate the hotness of a professor for women. Eventually, it was applied to men as well.
Women have to work harder to gain the respect of students. I see this almost everyday at work. And, frankly, this is bullshit.
The thing is, we’re taught to believe that we live in a time of progress, that things are getting better. They’re not. The simple economic measurement women’s wages as a percentage of men’s for equal work has barely changed in the past 30 years. And then there’s social media. Remember #Gamergate? That’s one egregious example. Beard’s story is another. But it happens every single day.
I don’t think this is getting better. I think it’s getting worse. And the same is true, in many ways of racism, homophobia, and the like. Social media allows people to hide behind anonymity to be bullies.
We need to be better. This cannot keep happening. We need to do a better job of educating people, so that they’re not bullies. And the thing is, I’m not sure that many of the people who act like this online actually recognize their real-world actions. As in, it’s easy to call someone names on a computer screen, not seeing the actual impact of it. There are, essentially, no consequences for the abuser in this world. Thus, education. We need to convince people that there are consequences of their on-line actions, just as there are consequences for their real-world actions.
Maybe then we can live in a world where women, amongst others, aren’t attacked on-line for the simple fact of their gender (or race, orientation, etc.).